| |
|
Category: algorithms | | Component type: function |
Prototype
Includes
is an overloaded name; there are actually two includes
functions.
template <class InputIterator1, class InputIterator2>
bool includes(InputIterator1 first1, InputIterator1 last1,
InputIterator2 first2, InputIterator2 last2);
template <class InputIterator1, class InputIterator2, class StrictWeakOrdering>
bool includes(InputIterator1 first1, InputIterator1 last1,
InputIterator2 first2, InputIterator2 last2,
StrictWeakOrdering comp);
Description
Includes
tests whether one sorted range includes another sorted range. That is, it returns true
if and only if, for every element in [first2, last2)
, an equivalent element [1] is also present in [first1, last1)
[2]. Both [first1, last1)
and [first2, last2)
must be sorted in ascending order.
The two versions of includes
differ in how they define whether one element is less than another. The first version compares objects using operator<
, and the second compares objects using the functors comp
.
Definition
Defined in the standard header algorithm, and in the nonstandard backward-compatibility header algo.h.
Requirements on types
For the first version:
-
InputIterator1
is a model of InputIterator.
-
InputIterator2
is a model of InputIterator.
-
InputIterator1
and InputIterator2
have the same value type.
-
InputIterator
's value type is a model of LessThanComparable.
-
The ordering on objects of
InputIterator1
's value type is a strict weak ordering, as defined in the LessThanComparable requirements.
For the second version:
-
InputIterator1
is a model of InputIterator.
-
InputIterator2
is a model of InputIterator.
-
InputIterator1
and InputIterator2
have the same value type.
-
StrictWeakOrdering
is a model of StrictWeakOrdering.
-
InputIterator1
's value type is convertible to StrictWeakOrdering
's argument type.
Preconditions
For the first version:
-
[first1, last1)
is a valid range.
-
[first2, last2)
is a valid range.
-
[first1, last1)
is ordered in ascending order according to operator<
. That is, for every pair of iterators i
and j
in [first1, last1)
such that i
precedes j
, *j < *i
is false
.
-
[first2, last2)
is ordered in ascending order according to operator<
. That is, for every pair of iterators i
and j
in [first2, last2)
such that i
precedes j
, *j < *i
is false
.
For the second version:
-
[first1, last1)
is a valid range.
-
[first2, last2)
is a valid range.
-
[first1, last1)
is ordered in ascending order according to comp
. That is, for every pair of iterators i
and j
in [first1, last1)
such that i
precedes j
, comp(*j, *i)
is false
.
-
[first2, last2)
is ordered in ascending order according to comp
. That is, for every pair of iterators i
and j
in [first2, last2)
such that i
precedes j
, comp(*j, *i)
is false
.
Complexity
Linear. Zero comparisons if either [first1, last1)
or [first2, last2)
is an empty range, otherwise at most 2 * ((last1 - first1) + (last2 - first2)) - 1
comparisons.
Example
int A1[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 };
int A2[] = { 1, 4, 7 };
int A3[] = { 2, 7, 9 };
int A4[] = { 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 };
int A5[] = { 1, 2, 13, 13 };
int A6[] = { 1, 1, 3, 21 };
const int N1 = sizeof(A1) / sizeof(int);
const int N2 = sizeof(A2) / sizeof(int);
const int N3 = sizeof(A3) / sizeof(int);
const int N4 = sizeof(A4) / sizeof(int);
const int N5 = sizeof(A5) / sizeof(int);
const int N6 = sizeof(A6) / sizeof(int);
cout << "A2 contained in A1: "
<< (includes(A1, A1 + N1, A2, A2 + N2) ? "true" : "false") << endl;
cout << "A3 contained in A1: "
<< (includes(A1, A1 + N2, A3, A3 + N3) ? "true" : "false") << endl;
cout << "A5 contained in A4: "
<< (includes(A4, A4 + N4, A5, A5 + N5) ? "true" : "false") << endl;
cout << "A6 contained in A4: "
<< (includes(A4, A4 + N4, A6, A6 + N6) ? "true" : "false") << endl;
The output is:
A2 contained in A1: true
A3 contained in A1: false
A5 contained in A4: false
A6 contained in A4: true
Notes
[1] This reads "an equivalent element" rather than "the same element" because the ordering by which the input ranges are sorted is permitted to be a strict weak ordering that is not a total ordering: there might be values x
and y
that are equivalent (that is, neither x < y
nor y < x
is true) but not equal. See the LessThanComparable requirements for a fuller discussion.) If you're using a total ordering (if you're using strcmp
, for example, or if you're using ordinary arithmetic comparison on integers), then you can ignore this technical distinction: for a total ordering, equality and equivalence are the same.
[2] Note that the range [first2, last2)
may contain a consecutive range of equivalent elements: there is no requirement that every element in the range be unique. In this case, includes
will return false
unless, for every element in [first2, last2)
, a distinct equivalent element is also present in [first1, last1)
. That is, if a certain value appears n
times in [first2, last2)
and m
times in [first1, last1)
, then includes
will return false
if m < n
.
See also
set_union
, set_intersection
, set_difference
, set_symmetric_difference
, sort